Julianne Moore explains ambiguous ‘Echo Valley’ ending

Warning: this article contains spoilers on Echo Valley.

How far should they (or should they) go to protect her child?

This is the question at the heart of Echo Valley, The new thriller with Julianne Moore and Sydney Sweeney. On Apple TV + from Friday, the film follows Kate (Moore), a mother who cries the recent loss of his wife, and Claire (Sweeney), the troubled girl of Kate.

From start to finish, the film does not offer easy answers on what constitutes a breaking point for a parent who takes care of his child. Kate likes to be clear unconditionally, so much so that when Claire presents herself by crying and covered in blood, Kate launches into action to throw the body of Claire’s boyfriend, Ryan (Edmund Donovan).

It may seem an imprudence or a bridge too far, even for a devoted mother, but Moore says that it is the result of the unstable mental state of the character at this stage of his life. “I don’t think she thinks very far forward,” says Moore Entertainment every week. “This is a step at a time, and it is at a very, very low point when we meet her for the first time. She lost her partner, and she is completely devoid.

“She is under enormous economic pressure trying to advance this farm, and she is dealing with the dependence of her daughter,” she continues. “The only person she likes more than everything is this girl who fights with drugs. When she comes to her and says:” I need help “, her first instinct is:” Okay, what should I do? “Then it becomes quite unavoidable.

Claire said to Kate that she killed Ryan in a moment of self -defense during a fight, only so that Kate later discovers that Claire manipulated her to throw the body of a child who overdosed with drugs that Ryan sold to him. Although you have to wonder why the tar cane -shaped body in Claire’s car does not raise more questions.

“It’s really funny,” said Moore, laughing. “This is the choice of production. It was not me. It is true; it is rather suspicious. But it is not rational. In addition, if I saw an enveloped corpse, I do not know that I would set it off. I would be frightened. And that is the other too. It is afraid.”

This fear turns into anger when she realizes that Claire has manipulated her to become an accomplice in the death of another man. “The betrayal is extreme,” notes Moore. “She is shocked. But these women are very, very close, and they are both exceptionally volatile. They both push things to the extreme. And you certainly see that at the end, when you realize what Kate was able to do.”

This end is particularly obvious in a confrontation between Kate and Claire in which Claire threatens to hurt Kate’s dog to force her mother to give her money. Kate then protects her dog with her own body. “The actors always like to have fun and extreme emotional things to do,” notes Moore. “There was a lot of fun. We were able to push it very far. But the only element was that we had to pay very attention to this dog. We could not cry around the dog because the dog does not know that you are pretending. Sydney and I know that we are pretending, so we cannot do it, but the dog does not do it. So all these scenes where the dog was present.”

At the end of the film, Kate must concoct her own developed manipulations. Ryan’s dealer / boss, Jackie (Domhnall Gleeson), uses Kate’s protection to make her sing to give her more money. She feels completely trapped until she designs a plan to supervise Jackie for insurance fraud, criminal fire and homicide. It is a shocking turn of events when his helpless submission to Jackie turns out to be a front for his masterful scheme.

Moore remembers being completely delighted by this twist. “When I had the script, I was sick in bed and I said to myself:” Okay, let me read a few things “”, she recalls. “So I say to myself: ‘Okay, it’s a family drama. It’s emotional. It was really well written. And I didn’t see this twist coming. I was absolutely delighted. I laughed aloud. Do not underestimate a middle-aged woman.”

With the normality restored once again the day after their test of strength and a barn fire, Kate hears a blow to the door a night – and opens it to see Claire standing on her pole. Then the film cuts the black.

So, Kate will forgive Claire and will she welcome her with open arms, or will he slam the door on her face? “It’s a question for the public, right?” Posit moore. “This is where the film ends. The film ends with:” And here is a blow to the door. “I know what my answer is, but many people who saw the film said different things.

“Some people say like:” Oh, absolutely, she let her in “, or” I would let her enter “, continues Moore. “Others say:” Oh no, I would not open the door. I wouldn’t do that. “It’s wonderful to see that it is really open to discussion at the end of the film.

Moore is reluctant to share what she thinks that Kate or even herself would do. “I want you to wonder,” she said. “I want you to go,” What would I do? “This is what the film asks.”

Do you want more cinematographic news? Register Weekly entertainmentThe free newsletter to get the latest trailers, celebrity interviews, film reviews, etc.

The final silent looks between Kate and Claire are quite imperative, and Moore notes that she and Sweeney were invited to give a wide range of options in their acting choices. “I have been given a lot of direction,” she said. “I did a lot of different things. Much of the management was to feel everything and let a lot of choices get into my head.”

Moore, however, is finally sold and admits that his instinct would be to forgive Claire. “I would open the door and let it in,” she said. “Many people have different relationships with these kinds of things. But I have the impression that it is forever and never connected to this girl.”